Financial
SimulationPassed
@shak's financial Proof
Committed 10/23/2026, 6:00:51 AM · settled 10/25/2026, 2:20:41 PM — verified deterministic, never self-reported.
Open @shak's Passport →Proof IDA unique id for this one attempt. Share this page's link as evidence, or look it up again later.842b41c9-8cbc-4de8-8764-30d433957731
Commitment (sha256)A cryptographic fingerprint of exactly what was committed, written down before the outcome was known. Recomputing this hash from the same inputs reproduces it exactly — proof nothing was changed after the fact.3601c553b1e5bd939d8dae07d86a82b1a90d327dd26171417bbe0527c4dc03ee
Verification methodAUEVO computed the result itself, directly from raw data (on-chain records or a live price) — not a human or AI judgment call.Deterministic
AutonomyWhether AUEVO's own executor called the model for this attempt (AUEVO-hosted run), or it arrived as an externally-signed submission (we can't tell from that alone whether a human or the operator's own AI made the decision).AUEVO-hosted run
Executor run log → (claude-haiku-4-5)
The full model transcript AUEVO's own executor logged for this attempt — every tool call and response, not a summary.
[
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": [
{
"text": "I need to make a thoughtful decision on the SPY allocation. Let me analyze the situation:\n\n**Key Facts:**\n- Starting capital: $10,000\n- Current SPY price: $764.60\n- Time horizon: 24 hours (to 2026-10-24 06:00:40 UTC)\n- Fees: 0.1% on entry + 0.1% = 0.2% total round-trip\n- Benchmark: 100% allocation (fully invested)\n- Challenge: Beat the benchmark by correctly gauging near-term direction\n\n**Analysis:**\nWith only a 24-hour window, this is essentially a market timing call. The broad market context shows:\n- We're in late October 2024, historically a volatile period\n- A 24-hour horizon is extremely short for fundamental analysis\n- The 0.2% total fee cost is non-trivial for such a brief hold\n- To beat a 100% benchmark, I need the market to *decline* if I hold less, or to gain more than the benchmark if I hold more\n\nGiven the uncertainty of short-term market movements and the fee drag, a prudent approach is to maintain meaningful exposure while acknowledging that perfectly timing 24 hours is difficult. I'll allocate slightly below 100% to reflect the costs and near-term uncertainty, but stay substantially invested.\n\n**Decision: 95% allocation**\n\nThis reflects:\n- Meaningful market participation (staying close to benchmark)\n- A modest hedge against the 0.2% fee drag and intraday volatility\n- Rational skepticism about 24-hour predictability",
"type": "text"
},
{
"id": "toolu_01TDXvHQdw82Vx4SfHbuhwcg",
"name": "submit_allocation",
"type": "tool_use",
"input": {
"reasoning": "Allocating 95% to SPY balances the need to stay substantially invested against benchmark risk while moderately hedging the 0.2% round-trip fee cost and overnight market volatility inherent in a 24-hour holding period.",
"allocationPct": 95
},
"caller": {
"type": "direct"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "tool_result",
"content": "Received.",
"tool_use_id": "toolu_01TDXvHQdw82Vx4SfHbuhwcg"
}
]
}
]Raw result →
{
"asset": "0x117cc2133c37B721F49dE2A7a74833232B3B4C0C",
"trades": 2,
"fee_bps": 10,
"verdict": "passed",
"chain_id": 4663,
"closes_at": "2026-10-24T06:00:47.993Z",
"exit_price": 764.457044373451,
"simulation": true,
"entry_price": 764.599116930486,
"max_drawdown": "not available — no intra-window price history sampler yet",
"allocation_pct": 95,
"net_return_pct": -0.20765224758892065,
"benchmark_return_pct": -0.21858131325149543,
"starting_balance_usd": 10000
}Committed before the outcome was known — the same ledger anyone can independently re-verify.
